The narration of science might appear as a beautiful straight line, where one discovery logically follows another. However, progress frequently stalls due to the human element. Experts and academics can reject groundbreaking concepts for years simply because their originators lack sufficient authority or because the findings threaten the established worldview. We recount three narratives about how self-taught individuals and young enthusiasts overturned scientific understandings, despite ridicule and boycotts from the establishment.
John Harrison: A Carpenter Versus the Astronomers
In the early eighteenth century, the main affliction for mariners was the inability to determine longitude accurately—the displacement of a vessel east or west. Navigation errors cost thousands of sailors their lives. The most notable tragedy occurred off the Isles of Scilly in 1707, where nearly 2,000 people perished due to incorrect calculations.
The British Parliament announced a substantial reward for anyone who could solve the longitude problem. The prize amounted to 20,000 pounds sterling—nearly 4 million pounds in contemporary currency.
What the Idea Entailed
The scientific board, composed of astronomers and mathematicians, was certain: the solution must be sought in the heavens, by observing the stars and the Moon. But John Harrison, a self-taught carpenter and clockmaker from Yorkshire without formal schooling, reasoned differently.
He approached the issue as an engineer. Harrison realized the necessity for hyper-accurate timepieces that would display Greenwich time anywhere on the ocean, without being disrupted by pitching, humidity, or heat. By comparing the time on his clock with the local noon, a sailor could easily calculate longitude.
In 1759, he unveiled his masterpiece—the marine chronometer H4. It was a small device, about the size of a large onion.
Experts’ Reaction
The academic elite fiercely resisted the invention. The Board of Longitude, attended by gentlemen with university degrees, could not accept the notion that a “rough mechanic” had devised an invention fit only for learned scholars. They trusted only the astronomical method and complex mathematical calculations.
Despite this, the H4 chronometer passed trials brilliantly. On a voyage to Barbados, the error over 47 days was only 39 seconds. For positioning, this translated to an inaccuracy of about 10 nautical miles, well within the permissible 30. But the Board refused to pay the full prize. Officials shifted the goalposts, demanding Harrison reveal all the mechanism’s secrets and prove that other artisans could replicate it.
Justice only prevailed after the intervention of King George III. By 1773, Harrison received the majority of the money. His chronometers became the primary navigational instrument for the next 200 years, until the advent of GPS. Harrison’s first three chronometers—H1, H2, and H3—still function today. The hands of H4 no longer move, as it requires routine oiling.
The Wright Brothers: Bicycle Mechanics Who Dreamed of Flight
Wilbur and Orville Wright were not professional engineers and received no government subsidies. They operated their own bicycle shop in Dayton, Ohio. It was the revenue from selling and repairing bicycles that funded their experiments with flight.
What the Idea Entailed
The brothers transposed the principles of bicycle mechanics into aviation. They used light and robust structures, and they adapted bicycles themselves to test wing aerodynamics. On December 17, 1903, Orville Wright achieved the first controlled flight in a powered aircraft in history.
Experts’ Reaction
One might expect the world to have been stunned. Instead, the brothers met a wall of silence and skepticism. The US scientific community and the press either ignored them or considered them frauds and tricksters.
The authoritative journal Scientific American refused to acknowledge the Wrights’ success for years. Even three years after the first flight, the editorial staff showed only mild interest in them. The issue was not that flight was deemed impossible, but rather who accomplished it. The establishment anticipated a breakthrough from scientists in laboratories, not from guys from a bicycle shop. President Roosevelt even ordered an inquiry into the Wrights’ data, but military officials conducted the review listlessly and formally, maintaining their doubt.
The Outcome
Recognition only arrived in 1908, following demonstration flights in Europe. Soon after, the brothers shut down their bicycle business and founded an aircraft manufacturing company. The resentment toward American scientific officials was so profound that in 1928, Orville Wright sent the very first aircraft, the Flyer, to a museum in London, stating that the Smithsonian Institution in the US was distorting aviation history.
Barry Marshall: The Intern Who Drank Bacteria
Even in the 1980s, any physician would have told you that stomach ulcers result from stress, spicy food, and excess acid. This was not merely a theory but the foundation of a massive enterprise. Acid-reducing medications generated billions of dollars annually for pharmaceutical companies.
What the Idea Entailed
A young doctor-intern from Australia, Barry Marshall, and pathologist Robin Warren discovered strange spiral-shaped bacteria in the stomachs of the sick. They proposed something unprecedented: ulcers are an infectious disease caused by the microbe Helicobacter pylori. Therefore, the cure was not lifelong diets but a course of simple antibiotics.
Experts’ Reaction
The medical world mocked Marshall. The main argument from critics sounded logical: no bacterium could survive the aggressive acid in the stomach.
Furthermore, the concept of treating ulcers with inexpensive pills threatened the profits of pharmaceutical giants. At conferences, Marshall was ridiculed, his ideas called nonsense, and his wife’s colleagues even pitied her because her husband was “that terrible man with wild ideas.” Doctors refused to believe results obtained from a sample of only 13 patients.
The Outcome
To break through the barrier of disbelief, Marshall took a desperate step. He cultivated a culture of the bacteria in a test tube and drank the broth.
A few days later, he began vomiting, and an endoscopy revealed acute gastritis and colonies of bacteria in his stomach. This is how he proved, on himself, that H. pylori causes illness in a healthy person. He then cured himself with antibiotics. The scientific paper released by the scholar still ranks first in an Australian scientific journal for citation count.
In 2005, Barry Marshall and Robin Warren received the Nobel Prize. Thanks to their persistence, ulcers ceased to be a chronic sentence, and stomach surgeries became rare.
Why This Occurs
The stories of Harrison, the Wright brothers, and Marshall teach us that the scientific milieu can be very conservative. Resistance to novelty often arises not from a lack of evidence, but from the protection of status and money. True breakthroughs are frequently achieved by those unafraid to appear ridiculous and willing to question what seems like undeniable truth to everyone else.
About the Author
