As our star dips beneath the horizon, the ocean is meant to descend into darkness. For the majority of Earth’s chronological record, the advent of night brought a predictable pattern of luminescence and shadow, dictating the feeding, resting, and migratory habits of marine life. Yet, along contemporary coastlines, true blackness is becoming an infrequent occurrence.
Artificial illumination originating from metropolitan areas, shipping hubs, and seaside construction now radiates significantly beyond the land’s edge, transforming shallow waters into continuously lit coastal zones.
While this ambient glow appears routine—or even comforting—to humans, it signifies a profound shift for fauna that evolved under the natural diurnal cycle.
New findings from the University of Miami suggest that sharks, some of the ocean’s most ancient predators, might be subtly affected by these transformations. The paper detailing these discoveries is featured in the journal Science of the Total Environment.
By tracking how metropolitan light alters a pivotal hormone governing internal clocks, researchers are gaining insight into how modern waterfronts reshape sub-surface existence.
Nighttime artificial light emanates from street lamps, structures, harbors, and beachfront residences. This radiance does not stay constrained to the landmass. In shallow coastal environs, intense light can propagate over considerable ranges, converting formerly dark habitats into illuminated territories.
For people, nocturnal lighting seems beneficial and safe. For aquatic fauna, this alteration may subtly disrupt inherent biological mechanisms.
Scientists had previously demonstrated that artificial illumination disrupts sleep-regulating hormones in avian species, insects, and bony fish. Sharks, however, remained an unexplained variable.
To investigate this concealed impact, investigators from the Shark Research and Conservation Program initiated a pioneering study.
The investigation was conducted offshore from Miami, Florida, one of the most brightly lit coastal metropolises in the United States. Sharks from these urban waters were contrasted with those inhabiting nearby, comparatively darker coastal regions.
In this research, scientists quantified melatonin levels in the blood of wild sharks for the first time. This accomplishment alone unlocked novel pathways for examining shark physiology and well-being.
The work focused on two shark species exhibiting contrasting movement patterns. Nurse sharks typically maintain residency within a localized area for extended periods.
Their migratory range is constrained, and familiar sheltering spots often serve as their perpetual base. Blacktip sharks operate quite differently. Regular expeditions across expansive littoral zones define their day-to-day activities.
This divergence allowed researchers to test a critical hypothesis. If artificial luminescence perturbs melatonin, then sharks consistently residing in illuminated locales might experience a more acute effect than those traversing between bright and dim waters.
Melatonin is essential for directing the body’s intrinsic timing system. In many organisms, its concentration rises at night and falls during daylight hours. This schedule underpins rest cycles, metabolic function, and general health maintenance.
In humans, compromised melatonin production correlates with sleep disorders and metabolic issues. In wild populations, comparable disruptions can impair foraging, movement, and overall survivability.
Prior to this research, the role of melatonin in sharks remained largely undocumented. Sharks evolved over 400 million years ago, long preceding the invention of artificial light sources. Their deep evolutionary history makes any recent disturbance particularly concerning.
The outcomes revealed a distinct cleavage between the two species. Nurse sharks dwelling near intense artificial light sources exhibited significantly lower nighttime melatonin concentrations compared to nurse sharks from dimmer habitats.
Blacktip sharks showed no notable variation between the illuminated and dark zones.
“These findings indicate that nighttime exposure to artificial light can suppress melatonin levels in wild sharks, but susceptibility is behaviorally dependent,” stated study co-author Abigail Tinnery. “Species that habitually remain in high light-pollution areas appear more susceptible to light spillover than species that regularly move between lit and darker habitats.”
This realization underscores how lifestyle choices influence vulnerability. Remaining in the identical brightly lit spot night after night escalates both exposure and impact.
Sharks first navigated the planet’s oceans more than 400 million years ago. The fact that they can respond to light interference similarly to humans highlights how fundamentally vital and evolutionarily conserved this biological process is.
The species’ vast evolutionary timeline makes this finding especially striking, as it demonstrates the profound preservation of shared biological systems across disparate life forms.
“This also validates medical concerns regarding LED lighting, screens, and urban light pollution as contributors to illness and chronic conditions,” commented study co-author Professor Danielle Macdonald of the University of Miami. “Furthermore, researchers can now investigate other facets of shark melatonin physiology to see if variances exist in their melatonin receptors, which could potentially aid in developing novel treatments or drug targets for conditions linked to melatonin deficiency.”
This link connecting shark biology and human wellness unexpectedly elevates the study’s significance.
The field research spanned approximately one year. Sharks were captured at night using short-duration research handlines—floating ropes with baited hooks employed for safely securing sharks while minimizing distress.
Blood samples were drawn immediately upon capture to ensure accurate hormonal level documentation. Environmental parameters such as light intensity, water depth, and temperature were meticulously logged.
During the nocturnal operations, low-intensity red lighting was utilized to avoid interfering with natural light perception. This methodology enabled researchers to draw a direct correlation between exposure to urban illumination and alterations in shark physiology.
“Sharks fill crucial roles in maintaining the equilibrium of marine ecosystems, and physiological shifts in apex predators can cascade throughout the entire food web,” added study co-author Neil Hammerschlag.
Given that sharks occupy the apex of marine food webs, even minor biological perturbations can propagate across the entire oceanic system.
The study results argue that light pollution should be framed as a major ecological stressor, on par with more widely recognized threats like habitat loss and chemical contamination.
This research establishes important baseline melatonin readings for both nurse sharks and blacktip sharks. Future investigations can now chart how intensifying coastal development influences shark biology over time.
As cities expand and the artificial illumination of maritime boundaries increases, grasping the unseen costs associated with artificial light is becoming increasingly imperative.
From the shore, the ocean might appear tranquil at night. For the sharks existing under continuous luminescence, darkness has become a rarity, and the repercussions of this deprivation are only now coming to light.
About the Author
