New isotopic evidence from Neolithic mass graves in northeastern France suggests that some of Europe’s earliest conflicts did not conclude once the fighting stopped. Instead, victors may have staged chilling “victory feasts,” bringing home severed left arms as trophies and executing other captives in a public ritual intended to disgrace enemies and solidify community bonds.
The study, published in Science Advances, examined the remains of 82 individuals from the Alsace region (dating to approximately 4300–4150 BCE) and identified statistically significant chemical disparities between remains treated in a “normal” burial manner and those deposited in pits showing evidence of overkill, mutilation, and use as trophies.
At the sites of Achenheim and Bergheim, archaeologists uncovered complete or nearly complete skeletons bearing numerous unhealed wounds—a sign of “excessive brutality,” violence beyond what was necessary for killing—alongside isolated fragments of severed left upper limbs. The authors note that this specific combination is unparalleled in the European Neolithic record and does not fit conventional “massacre” narratives.
The team posits that the pits served as potential venues for a two-part post-conflict spectacle: severed arms taken from enemies slain in battle, and whole bodies representing captives who were brought back alive and killed in a more targeted, demonstrative fashion. The placement within the settlement strengthens the argument that these acts were meant to be witnessed.
In a broader context, early Neolithic violence has often been framed through the lens of raiding, communal mass killing, or execution; this new work contends that, at least here, the violence also functioned as a form of political messaging.
Researchers employed a “multi-isotopic biography” approach—tracking carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur isotopes in bone and tooth collagen, along with oxygen, carbon, and strontium in dental enamel—to reconstruct diet, mobility, stress levels, and likely origins. Crucially, the victims and non-victims differed significantly, supporting the premise that those found in the pits were not simply locals interred unconventionally.
One of the most striking patterns concerned the sulfur isotopes. At both sites, the severed left upper limbs formed a tighter cluster, whereas many complete skeletons displayed divergent sulfur values, implying that the trophies and the bodies might have originated from different groups or regions, even if they ended up in the same pits.
The paper further reports that the victims displayed more pronounced lifecycle changes (including evidence of mobility), bolstering the idea that they were outsiders drawn into the conflict—a distinction archaeologists often struggle to determine when studying prehistoric violence.
If this interpretation holds, Achenheim and Bergheim represent one of the earliest well-documented instances of celebrating military victories in prehistoric Europe—ritualized violence designed to desecrate the memory of the defeated and reinforce solidarity among the living. This shifts the debate past whether early farmers fought, and into the territory of how war was remembered and displayed.
It also complicates the use of simple labels like “massacre site.” The authors explicitly weighed several scenarios—trophies taken post-battle, captives executed later, intra-community punishment—before concluding that the isotopic data best aligns with victims from elsewhere and triumph rituals associated with warfare.
About the Author
