It seems Meta might finally be prepared to let the metaverse fade away.
Stock in the firm formerly known as Facebook surged 7% early Thursday following a Bloomberg story that CEO Mark Zuckerberg is reducing the metaverse team’s budget by as much as 30%. CNN has not verified the report. In a release, a Meta representative confirmed that “we are redirecting some of our funding” from the metaverse division toward AI spectacles and wearable gear.
The share closed the session up 3.4%.
It’s straightforward to grasp why the financial district is so elated. Following four years and significant sums squandered, the metaverse—a concept Zuck championed so strongly he renamed the corporation after it—is largely defunct.
The notion never made much sense, even when Zuck dramatically asserted the metaverse would be “the successor of the mobile internet.” The organization initially targeted 500,000 monthly active participants in Horizons Worlds, a virtual reality space, by the close of 2022. As per the Wall Street Journal, Meta adjusted that target down by almost half later that year.
To be precise, we do not yet know the fate of the metaverse, which belongs to Meta’s Reality Labs unit overseeing its virtual reality goggles. And Zuckerberg has maintained his conviction that people will eventually devote substantial time in virtual realms.
But the entire undertaking is, to put it mildly, a far cry from the expansive digital paradise of Zuck’s pandemic-era vision, and it’s being relegated to the back burner like numerous well-intentioned Covid initiatives.
Shareholders (and most individuals browsing the web) were wary from the outset.
The metaverse was an undefined proposition, presented to a public that had just emerged from Covid quarantines and yearned primarily to be near other people physically, in the actual world. Meta was suggesting that the future of social platforms would be immersive, akin to a massive Zoom meeting populated by digital reflections that can interact and play games and purchase items from each other for… enjoyment? The actual purpose wasn’t clear, and irrespective, achieving it necessitated obtaining a cumbersome $400 visor.
Naturally, the timing of Meta’s rebranding was also key. Facebook was urgently attempting to extricate itself from a mire of negative press connected to whistleblower Frances Haugen, who released internal papers to the Wall Street Journal detailing how the social media behemoth repeatedly neglected to tackle issues on its platforms that management knew were harming users (especially adolescents).
The corporation, under intense scrutiny and still smarting from missing the shift to smartphones, needed a change in narrative.
But the more individuals saw of the metaverse, the less appealing it seemed. Roughly one year after the Meta shift, a picture of Zuck’s own blocky, vacant-eyed likeness from within the metaverse became widespread due to how shockingly rudimentary the visuals remained after a year of effort and vast sums invested to construct it. At that juncture, I documented what seemed to be Meta’s chief metaverse difficulty: It simply doesn’t appear fashionable.
The initial allure of Facebook was partly rooted in how it enabled people to present themselves as fashionable, whatever that implied to them.
You could appear witty or attractive or enigmatic in your profile image. You could post a clever status update name-dropping some obscure indie music group. You cultivated an entire persona with your collections of favored films and music and literature. And you could forge connections in a manner that left the nature of your bond vague—”friending” could signify a great deal, or very little, no obligation, whatever, just appear cool.
That fashionable aspect is clearly absent in the metaverse. But Zuck might have absorbed at least one insight from the misstep: How things look matters, which is why Meta is recruiting Apple’s top designer, Alan Dye, to manage a new studio for hardware, software, and AI integration.
Savings from metaverse reductions, sources familiar with the strategies informed Bloomberg, are anticipated to be funneled to other ventures, including AI spectacles and different wearables, where Meta is striving to solidify its supremacy. This year, the firm held a substantial advantage over competitors, securing 61% of the marketplace for smart glasses and AR/VR headsets, according to IDC Global.
Like the metaverse, though, AI’s fiscal payoff is far from assured, and Wall Street has voiced unease about Zuck’s readiness to expend enormous sums on unproven technology, even one as well-liked as AI.
Zuck is, characteristically, undeterred. “If we end up squandering a couple of hundred billion dollars, I imagine that will be quite unfortunate, certainly,” he remarked in September on the “Access” podcast. “But what I would contend is I actually believe the hazard is greater on the other side.”
About the Author
