
A new, large-scale study led by Swansea University has put forth increasingly compelling evidence suggesting that early childhood nutrition can shape brain development, with these effects persisting into adolescence.
Published in the journal Advances in Nutrition, the paper synthesizes findings from 73 studies, comprising 48 controlled trials and 25 prospective studies, to examine the impact of diet on cognitive function and academic achievement in young individuals aged 8 to 19.
The investigation, supported by the IAFNS Committee on Cognitive Health, revealed that suboptimal dietary patterns in early childhood, particularly during infancy, can have lasting repercussions on adolescent intelligence.
“What seems clearest is that the foundations for cognitive health appear to be laid very early on. Poor nutrition in the first few years of life has been associated with lower intelligence later in life, even when accounting for many other factors,” explained Professor Hayley Young, the study’s lead author from Swansea University’s School of Psychology. “The picture in adolescence is more mixed, with some interventions showing promising results, but the evidence is far from conclusive. This is why we need more carefully designed studies to determine if adolescence is genuinely a second window of opportunity to support the developing brain through nutrition, rather than just assuming it is.”
Following infancy, adolescence marks a second crucial period of neuroplasticity, characterized by widespread structural and functional brain changes, partly driven by hormonal and endocrine shifts during puberty.
To reflect how the brain develops over time, the review incorporates data from longitudinal studies that trace the links between early-life nutrition and subsequent cognitive and academic outcomes. This lifespan approach acknowledges that later abilities build upon earlier developmental stages, enabling the team to explore how early nutrition might influence outcomes years later.
The researchers evaluated long-term data across a broad spectrum of nutrients and dietary components, including iron, iodine, choline, vitamin D, polyphenols, fatty acids, whole grains, and comprehensive dietary interventions.
While findings across different research fields may appear contradictory, the authors caution against interpreting this as evidence of a minor role for diet. Instead, they contend that the influence of nutrition is multifaceted, depending on factors such as the timing of dietary exposure during development, the characteristics of the population studied, the duration and type of intervention, and the specific cognitive abilities being measured.
To advance research in this emerging field, the team proposes seven guiding principles for future investigations:
Consider the entire lifespan.
Look beyond isolated nutrients.
Utilize biomarker of dietary intake.
Include sex- and puberty-specific data analyses.
Standardize outcome measures.
Prioritize contextual and demographic characteristics.
Account for underlying confounding factors.
The authors conclude that more high-quality research is essential to determine whether adolescence represents a distinct opportunity for enhancing cognitive development through dietary interventions.