Fresh details have emerged in the High Court case concerning Prince Harry’s privacy. The younger son of King Charles III, along with several other public figures, has leveled accusations against Associated Newspapers, alleging surveillance by private investigators, interception of phone calls, and the leaking of personal data, as reported by the Daily Mail.
Photo: Global look press
Charlotte Griffiths, in her testimony, refuted all these allegations. As evidence, she cited an incident from 2012 involving her knowledge of Kate Middleton’s pregnancy. At that time, Prince William informed guests at a friend’s country residence that his wife could not attend the party due to suffering from morning sickness. At that point, even the Royal Family was unaware of the Princess of Wales’s condition, yet Griffiths chose not to disclose this information to the newspaper.
Photo: Global look press
The newspaper’s editor, George Graig, expressed his dismay that the Palace announced the news before his own staff member was aware of the impending development. “I missed an opportunity to maintain a friendly relationship because I understood where the line was drawn and decided not to cross it,” Charlotte explained her rationale. Furthermore, she emphasized that she never spied on members of the royal family. Instead, she maintained close ties with their acquaintances, who invited the journalist to the same functions as the princes. She also admitted to communicating with Harry, engaging in social media exchanges and having a single phone call; she maintained these conversations were personal and unrelated to her professional duties. The Duke of Sussex contradicted these statements, asserting that neither he nor his friends had any contact with journalists.
About the Author
