For numerous years, Apple has maintained a practice of deploying system-on-a-chip (SoC) components with disabled sections in their gadgets, rather than discarding them. It has recently come to light that Apple’s utilization of this technique dates back to the era of the iPhone 4 and the inaugural iPad.
The core of this methodology is quite straightforward: should a processor fail to meet full quality assurance standards—for instance, if a specific graphics or computation core exhibits instability—the SoC is not immediately scrapped. Instead, Apple deactivates the flawed modules and incorporates the chip into less expensive devices or lower-tier configurations.
A prime illustration is the standard MacBook Air, equipped with an M1 SoC featuring a 7-core GPU instead of the full 8-core version. While the distinction is often negligible for the end-user, this enables the corporation to maximize the utilization of manufactured silicon and thereby minimize production waste.
This methodology remains in active use presently:
- “Trimmed” variants of A-series SoCs are integrated into more budget-friendly iPhones and iPads.
- Platforms deemed unsuitable for flagship models are repurposed for simpler electronics.
- Certain SoCs even transition between device categories; for instance, chips initially designed for smartphones might end up in streaming boxes or smart speakers.
For example, A4 SoCs exhibiting elevated power consumption proved suboptimal for the iPhone but were well-suited for the Apple TV. Furthermore, less efficient processors initially intended for the Apple Watch were subsequently employed in HomePod speakers.
According to reports from The Wall Street Journal, Apple persists in actively leveraging this strategy across its latest hardware. A particularly telling instance is the iPhone 17e, launched in the spring of 2026. This handset boasted several enhancements over the iPhone 16e while retaining its entry price point of \$600. WSJ indicates that the iPhone 17e utilizes SoCs that, for various reasons, did not qualify for integration into the pricier iPhone 17, which starts at \$800. Essentially, Apple once again incorporated partially substandard chips into the more accessible model.
A comparable scenario is reported regarding the iPhone Air. Processors that did not meet the criteria for the flagship iPhone 17 Pro were redirected into this ultra-slim smartphone. Notably, the issues users cite with the iPhone Air are unrelated to processing power—critiques center on the weak battery, the lack of a full-fledged speaker, the absence of a SIM tray, and the presence of only a single main camera.
The strategy of employing these salvaged SoCs became particularly evident with the introduction of the new MacBook Neo, a device that has substantially disrupted the market for economical laptops. Priced at \$600, this unit features a metal chassis and an A18 Pro processor derived from the iPhone 16 Pro, but with one deactivated graphics core: resulting in a 5-core GPU instead of the standard 6-core.
Despite this concession, the MacBook Neo proved so successful that Apple was compelled to ramp up production swiftly. Moreover, the laptop has caused considerable consternation among manufacturers of budget Windows devices. Media reports suggest that even Windows 11, when run via a virtual machine on the Neo, performs faster and more reliably than on many comparable Windows laptops in the same price bracket.
While this approach has long been conventional within the semiconductor sector, Apple has managed to mold it into a vital component of its overall product strategy. This enables the corporation to reduce unit costs, enhance the yield of usable chips, and maintain a clear delineation in performance and pricing across its device lineup.
About the Author
